![]() ![]() ![]() Petitioner then offered to pose as the buyer because the seller, who was her close friend, allegedly wanted to deal only with her to keep his financial constraints within his close family friends. However, he was eventually convinced to purchase the subject properties due to the persistent assurances of petitioner that: (a) the titles thereto were clean (b) the transfer certificates of title (TCT) would be issued in respondent's name after the execution of the sale and (c) that the offered selling price was very reasonable and even bordering on a bargain sale considering the location of the properties and their proximity to business centers. At first, respondent was hesitant to buy the said lands. Respondent alleged that sometime in April or May 1997, petitioner told him that she knows of two parcels of land that were being offered for sale at a reasonable price. Respondent further prayed for the payment of attorney's fees, litigation expenses and costs of suit. Respondent prayed that he be declared the true owner of two parcels of land located in Barrio Pineda, Pasig City, and to have said properties reconveyed to him. 70886-PSG, an Action for Reconveyance and Damages with a Prayer for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction against petitioner. Lopez (petitioner) appeal from the NovemDecision 4 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasig City, Branch 67 in Civil Case No. 96678 which denied petitioner Doris Marie S. This Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 challenges the FebruDecision 2 and AugResolution 3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. If, if someone has intermingled classified documents in all kinds of other personal property," Pryor said.DORIS MARIE S. "I don't think it's necessarily the fault of the government. Trusty also sought to take issue with how agents conducted the search, noting that in addition to presidential records and documents with classification markings they also seized items like "golf shirts and pictures of Celine Dion" which he said should have no relevance to their criminal investigation.īut Chief Judge Bill Pryor noted it wasn't unusual for such personal items to be swept up in a court-authorized search. Neither could name such a case, but Trusty suggested that by having the process play out they could perhaps find evidence that Trump's rights were violated. The judges pressed Joshi and Trusty as to whether there was any similar case where a judge has exercised such jurisdiction to intervene in an ongoing criminal investigation prior to indictment with any showing of "callous disregard" for the rights of the potential defendant. ![]() The attorney for Trump, Jim Trusty, insisted Trump was looking for no special treatment but asked the court to consider "a political rival has been subjected to a search warrant where thousands of personal materials have been taken."Īrguing for the Justice Department, Sopan Joshi of the Solicitor General's office called the appointment of a special master by a district court judge an "extraordinary judicial intrusion into a core executive branch function." "Other than the fact that this involves a former president, everything else about this is indistinguishable from any pre-indictment search warrant," Judge Andrew Brasher said. Circuit Court of Appeals questioned an assertion from Trump's attorney that "this is an extraordinary case" that warranted intervention from an outside arbiter to review all the materials seized in the August search. In a hearing Tuesday afternoon, a three-judge panel from the 11th U.S. A federal appeals court on Tuesday seemed poised to grant a Justice Department request to rescind the appointment of a special master in the investigation into the handling of classified material seized in August from former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |